The Rule of Thirds
The ancient Greeks did a lot of thinking. So much thinking, in fact, that much of it still affects nearly every aspect modern life.
The Greeks thought a lot about what was good. They thought about what looked good. Greek mathematicians came up with an idea that they called the Golden Ratio. There’s a lot of fancy maths involved, but we don’t need to be concerned with that.
It boils down to the idea (hugely simplified) that square stuff and round stuff and stuff in the middle of other stuff doesn’t generally look as good as rectangles (especially the Golden Rectangle), odd shapes, and things that are off centre.
The Golden Ratio turns out to be close enough to one-third for our purposes. (Well, actually about 2/3, but, never mind . . .)
So, how do we put this time-honoured secret of ancient artists of all stripes to work for us in our point-and-shoot camera? As it turns out, it doesn’t make a hill of beans difference what kind of camera you have, because it’s all in your head.
One gets so used to thinking about the Rule of Thirds that it becomes automatic. When I took this photo of a cute little hermit crab this morning, I wasn’t thinking, “Remember the Rule of Thirds.”I just snapped what looked good to me: (Thanks for the identification of the species Coenobita rugosus from our correspondent Melanie ‘Curlz’ Schmitz.)
However, as you can see, it does comply:
So, what is it?
Well, as you can see from the second shot with the lines drawn in (please don’t check the accuracy of my lines, I was guessing), the idea is that the photo will be more interesting if you place an important point of interest (usually the most important) near a point where two lines cross or along one or more of the lines.
Why is this? Don’t ask me. It just works.
When does it work? Well, almost always:
I could have centred the workmen and the cement truck. It would have been okay.
But, look at how the negative space of the poured cement forces your eyes towards the workmen and the truck. The cement has its own story, but because there’s so much of it there and it’s so uninteresting, it pushes your attention to the real subject of the image.
Here’s another example of when it works nicely:
The wall was pretty much the same everywhere. The young man looking out of the window (In Florence, Italy, if you’re wondering) is the focus of our interest. I could have cropped it differently so that the man in the window and the window above were both on intersections. I tried it. I didn’t like it.
In this shot of a blacksmith at a cultural show in Prague, I’m using two of the vertical lines:
There are two points of interest here: the blacksmith and the people watching him. To accent the watchers, I blurred everything but the faces that are turned toward the blacksmith. It’s easy to overdo this sort of funny business and I nearly did so here.
Here’s a shot that uses two intersections:

Sometimes the Rule of Thirds works even if taken to extremes. The kind of cropping that you see here is extreme:

I really had no choice. The couple was standing next to some other people. I had to crop very closely on the man to get rid of a beer can in someone else’s hand. It was a misty morning up in the Vienna Woods. I wanted to get the mood of the scene. The couple seemed to be almost intrusive. I took the shot anyway, thinking that I could crop them out later. When I saw it on the screen, I said, “No way.” They look as if they belong there.
It takes a little time to begin to think of composition when taking snapshots, but sometimes it pays.
Related posts:
- The Panorama Techniques or Bore Me To Tears I’m not sure why I suddenly got the idea that somebody out there might be interested in this. My brain works, when it works, in mysterious ways. I did a two-frame exposure with my Canon G0 a couple of days ago of a mediocre sunrise. As I was stitching it...
- Our House As I sit at my desk at home today with the morning sun’s blonde radiance streaming in through my bedroom window listening to Our House from the 1970 Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young album Déjà Vu, I’m overcome by weepy sentimentality. Did you ever feel so completely contented with life...
- The Cows of Prague If Prague were an animal I think it would be a platypus. It’s just a little bit of everything stitched together into something that’s more interesting than any of its parts. I guess it’s a synergism. Anyway, we had lots of fun there. Here’s a panorama from the top of...
- Doing It in the Dark Every dinky camera made has a flash built in. That goes for even the most expensive of the point-and-shoots. A big clunky external flash unit puts you squarely in the geek realm insofar as fashion goes. However, most internal flash gizmos are next to useless if you want to create...
- Our Reefs – Our Life – for Our Way From an article I've submitted to the Airlines PNG in-flight magazine, Our Way. I'm covering "The Other Carbon Dioxide Problem". Maybe you've heard of it....
- More Silliness in Europe As you’ve suspected by now, I’m going back through photos taken as long ago as ten or twelve years to mine for gold – okay, maybe not gold. Let’s say copper, or at least lead. Today I’ve been looking for things that gave me a chuckle. If I get lucky,...
- Florence and Siena – Tuscany Revisited It’s hard to think of anything that I did not like about Tuscany. Much as the rest of Italy and Sicily, it is a photographer’s wonderland. I could do a dozen posts containing photos of the region, but I’d quickly run out of prose. Most of the snaps would be...



[...] Worried The Rule of Thirds [...]
[...] image above makes good use of the Rule of Thirds. As it turns out, it’s my favourite of the [...]
[...] needed just a tiny bit more space between the canoe paddle and the left edge. It’s taking the Rule of Thirds too [...]
[...] first shot really grabs me. I’d call the composition excellent. It makes good use of the Rule of Thirds. The smaller, gnarly tree and its shadow pierce the space and take it over like Atilla the [...]
[...] this image it is a no-brainer. If we were dealing with other images we might want to think of the Rule of Thirds. Here, however, we just need to grab as much detail as we [...]
This is a great explanation for the Rule of Thirds. The examples really help.
Like you, I just intuitively (most of the time) tend to follow it, but having it explained helps put it more distinctly in my thought and is a big help to this beginning photographer. Thanks!
Composition gets to be a pretty deep well to fall into if you squeeze the lemon as hard as you can (how’s that for a mixed metaphor?) Here’s a couple of basic composition rules sites: here and here.
Thanks my man! I’ll check them out.