The Long-Nosed or Longnosed or Longnose Hawkfish

No Gravatar

I’ll get into the explanation of the confusing title of this post later. First, you have to get up with me at 05:30 to come out and see the sunrise. It wasn’t particularly thrilling this morning. I caught the first light here with three exposures of 15 seconds each stitched together in a panorama with Photoshop:Purple Sunrise PanoramaThe water was very calm this morning and the long exposures turned it into a mirror.

While I was at it, I made this new header for Madang – Ples Bilong Mi:

Crazy Purple Header

The goofy font is called “Thriller”;  I have no idea why. I suppose that they had to call it something.

Yesterday, I left a “Mystery Fish” image with you so that someone could identify it. The result of that experiment was underwhelming. Our own Lucy Proctor, a home-town girl, answered correctly with the common name and  the taxonomic name! Meet the Longnose Hawkfish (Oxycirrhites typus)  in all its mighty splendor:

Longnose Hawkfish (Oxycirrhites typus) [available light]

So, why the long, redundant title? In this case, I’m being a little pedantic. The common names are simply minor variations. In many cases, however the same fish will have completely different names in different places. To test this I Googled:

  • long-nosed hawkfish – 9,380 hits
  • longnosed hawkfish – 6,450 hits
  • longnose hawkfish – about 14,000 hits

The hyphen in the first entry doesn’t seem to make any difference, probably because Google ignores it, even if you surround the word with double quotes. In the second entry, longnosed, Google asked me if I meant longnose, so it must be doing something to see what the favoured term is – very cute. “Longnose” is the clear winner. Here’s what’s interesting:

  • “Oxycirrhites typus” – 8,420 hits

The correct taxonomic name falls somewhere in the middle of the number of references. Okay, okay, it’s not  very interesting. I’m just filling space here.

This may sound silly to some, but I’ve been trying to get these shots for more than ten years. It’s a fairly rare fish. The only place where I know that it can be seen almost without fail is on the The Henry Leith  near Wongat Island.

The little devils are very shy. They like to keep something between you and them. That’s why they are so hard to capture. In the shot above, the best I’ve ever managed, there is still a bit of pesky  coral between me and the fish. Both of these first two shots were exposed with natural light, no flash.

Longnose Hawkfish (Oxycirrhites typus) [available light]If you can get one to come out in the open, you can’t get very close or it will tease you mercilessly by moving each time it sees your finger tightening on the shutter release. At least that’s how it seems. The whole operation involves a lot of contorted positions, grappling to find a hold without damaging anything, and holding of breath until tunnel vision sets in. Not to brag, but one really has to work to get shots such as these.

Just to be contrary, I turned on the flash for this shot. The colours here are what you will see in most images of this fish. It’s prettier, but it is not as accurate as the shot taken with available light and corrected for tint and colour temperature:Longnose Hawkfish (Oxycirrhites typus) [flash] - Jan MessersmithIt is a lovely little fish and well worth the effort to capture its beauty.

Here is an image demonstrating good luck – bad luck. In a one second interval I had a chance for a perfect image of a Coral Grouper (Cephalopholis miniata):

Coral Grouper (Cephalopholis miniata)As you can see, I blew the chance. The now tail-less fish will not be decorating my desktop.

Finally, because I’m not finished bothering you, here’s another nutsy header that I made up this morning while Eunie was getting ready to go to the office:Big Pink Sunrise Header

Silliness and whimsy keep me feeling young.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Related posts:

  1. Hawkfishes – Little Jewels of the Sea It’s Saturday morning, so I’m off for a dive. I don’t have much time for composition, so I’ll just show you some pictures. (with apologies to those who have seen them a hundred times already) I like the Hawkfishes. Unlike some other families, there’s not an ugly one in the bunch. (Click...
  2. Colourful Fish and a Weird Sea Monster While mostly water, a salp is a colonial marine animal rarely seen by humans. I've seen them rarely when diving. Trevor Hattersley shot one from his boat....
  3. A Long, Hot Ride on a Harley One hundred and eight kilometres of Harley-eating potholes up the North Coast Road you will find The Tapira Surf Club. Nobody was home. The beer was hot....
  4. More Fun at Magic Passage Today we went to Magic Passage for our Saturday morning dive. There was a fairly strong incoming current and the water was very warm. Here is Tracey, Albert, and Anna heading out to the mouth of the passage: At about twenty metres, Albert was frantically pointing under a ledge. I...
  5. The Big Red Ball Two big red balls today. One is a feather star in the sea and the other is a huge flower in my yard. I'll let me botanist readers tell me what the flower is....
  6. Great Barracuda! I don't know why they call the Great Barracuda "great". It's not particularly pretty, though its teeth are impressive. I suppose it must be because of its size....
  7. The Papuan Scorpionfish – Junior and Senior More wholesome underwater goodness from the sweet new Canon G11. What a gas! Everybody should have one....
Tags: , , , ,

8 Responses to “The Long-Nosed or Longnosed or Longnose Hawkfish”

  1. Steve Goodheart Says:

    The big images of Mr. Long-nosed-Longnosed-Longnose Hawkfish are really quite lovely. As I said on FB, as pretty as it is elusive. As for your coral grouper, he’s too stunningly colored, even minus tail, not to show up at some point. (There, I’ve totally blown any creds as far as my image appreciation skills go!)

    As for the “Thriller” font….that would be a good one-night stand for Halloween or April 1st. Was fun to see it.

    Also, hadn’t run across “Oh my. The sky!” before….some jaw-dropping images there for this sky lover. Thanks! (I’m really loving your new Related Posts feature.)

  2. MadDog Says:

    I wish I hadn’t chopped off that tail. I gotta say, however, that I’m very happy about the Longnose Hawkfish. I’ve been in competition with a friend for a couple of years on that on. I’ve trounced him soundly now.

    I’m finding the related-post thing handy myself. It helps me to know what terms in a post that I should link back to other posts. This is a big key to keep people from drifting off somewhere else. Once you get enough content on a blog you want to link back to it as often as you can.

  3. Steve Goodheart Says:

    “…I’ve trounced him soundly now.” :) :)

    While I’m nowhere near having that kind of content, I wish they had that function with WP dot Com. Don’t think they do, and I can see how helpful it is. I’m going to try to be really diligent and strict with my tags, because I can see how they could help me in the future if I really take the time to make them meaningful and use them consistently.

  4. MadDog Says:

    I get a lot of hits on tags. All of the SEO BS can be safely ignored if you have enough content. When you get about 500-600 posts with good content you’ll start seeing hundreds of hits a day. I’m getting about 1.200 unique visitors a day now. (that was October’s average). It’s a long slog and I don’t think that there’s any shortcut. What you are up against is your narrow focus and probably a lot of competition.

  5. Steve Goodheart Says:

    Yeah, I’m going to take care of my tags. As for 500-600 posts, whoa, pardner, that’s be just a little while! :)

    I’m glad so many people are finding their way to your unique and beautiful site. And yes, my first blog has a narrow focus, and yet, there may well be lots of similar blogs. I’m of the mindset, “Build it, and they will come,” except it’s “Have good content that helps people in their lives and dharma practice, and they will come.” But I don’t expect there will ever be big numbers on my dharma site.

    Now, my future science/nature blog, I hope that does have some numbers, because that kind of site *should* have traffic, if it’s good. Of course, since WP dot com is non-commercial and ad-free, the numbers wouldn’t be for money, as it seems to be for so many blogs (and I’m not criticizing those blogs…it can be a honest way to put food on the table for you family) it would be a way to tell if your site was any good…as the numbers show yours is.

  6. MadDog Says:

    Yeah, there’s noting wrong with a narrow-focus site. It depends on what you want to do with it. I try to make mine as broad as possible, because many of my readers have me bookmarked and look at the site every day. They don’t want sameness – they want something fresh (well, as fresh as I can get) every day.

    I think that your nature site could be a biggie. It all depends on content and how much you can persuade your friends to get the link out. In the beginning, you need a lot of people endorsing your link to get numbers. That’s why I’ve hounded my friends and regular readers to pass my URL along and suggest it. Only a very small percentage have, but It’s helped. It also helps to put a link on your Facebook page for each post.

  7. Steve Goodheart Says:

    Good points. Thanks for the tips, and as always, for your support.

  8. Colourful Fish and a Weird Sea Monster | Madang - Ples Bilong Mi Says:

    [...] showed you an image of a Coral Grouper (Cephalopholis miniata) yesterday the tail of which I had accidentally amputated in my rush to get the shot. I thought that you might [...]

Leave a Reply